Rank on p_win: challenger instrument + retire edge from decisions

MEASURED BASIS (n=200 settled MLB rows): corr(p_win, outcome) = +0.26;
corr(edge, outcome) = -0.010 incumbent ruler / -0.022 consensus ruler.
Subtracting the market destroys the signal under BOTH rulers, so a
quantity that does not predict must not rank, gate or decide.

CHALLENGER-FIRST -- live ordering is byte-identical. rankGrades (the
incumbent, grade-first with edge as its 4th key) is untouched and tested
as untouched.

NEW: rankByForecast -- takeable-gated p_win -> grade -> confidence -> stable
order, with NO edge term anywhere. p_win LEADS and the letter follows,
deliberately: the letter measured r ~ 0.005 and is inverted (B 52.4% <
C 56.9%) while p_win measures +0.26, so leading with the letter would sort
by the weaker signal and use the stronger one only to break ties.

Recorded in the code: isotonic calibration is a MONOTONE transform, so
ranking on raw vs calibrated p_win gives the SAME ORDER. Calibration
matters when p_win is displayed or thresholded; it cannot change a
ranking. Nothing here needs the calibrated value.

rankingDelta + GET /api/internal/ranking-delta measure how far the board
would move before any flip. The endpoint reports p_win coverage alongside
the delta -- if p_win is absent the challenger degrades to grade order and
the delta UNDERSTATES, which is worth saying rather than reporting a clean
zero.

forecast_rank is stamped on snapshot grades BEFORE stripModelPrice, so
every tier gets the correct order without the paid values (the
topGradedService precedent -- an ordinal can travel where the magnitude
cannot). Additive only: nothing sorts by it yet.

RETIRED AS DECISIONS (not rankings, so done now):
- altLineScanner.compareToBookImplied no longer returns value_detected:
  edge > 0. Edge is still COMPUTED and returned -- losing the record would
  be worse than mis-using it -- but the verdict is an honest null with
  value_basis: 'retired:edge_does_not_predict'.
- scanAltLines no longer filters to edge>0 or calls the survivor "optimal".
  The whole ladder is returned ranked and labelled
  'price_gap_diagnostic_unvalidated'. The module has ZERO callers (verified)
  -- unwired like mlbGrader.js, left in place and made honest.

An honest asymmetry recorded there: ranking props AGAINST EACH OTHER must
not use edge, but choosing between RUNGS OF THE SAME PROP is inherently
price-relative -- ranking rungs by model probability alone would always
pick the lowest line, since P(over 0.5) > P(over 2.5) by construction. So
the gap stays the rung key, explicitly labelled unvalidated.

Two superseded tests updated to stronger properties.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QJs13VsyiSKYQP6rj3NNmc

src/routes/internal.js

@@ -556,4 +556,49 @@ router.get('/propline-verify', async (req, res) => {
   }
 });
 
+/**
+ * GET /api/internal/ranking-delta (Order: rank on p_win — CHALLENGER-FIRST)
+ *
+ * Reads the live snapshot and reports how far the board WOULD move if the
+ * ranking instrument changed from `rankGrades` (grade-first, edge as 4th key)
+ * to `rankByForecast` (p_win-first, no edge term). Changes nothing — the live
+ * ordering is untouched until this delta is reviewed.
+ *
+ *   ?sports=mlb,wnba   ?top=10
+ */
+router.get('/ranking-delta', async (req, res) => {
+  try {
+    const { cacheGet } = require('../utils/redis');
+    const { rankingDelta } = require('../utils/gradeRanking');
+    const sports = String(req.query.sports || 'mlb,wnba')
+      .split(',').map((x) => x.trim().toLowerCase()).filter(Boolean).slice(0, 6);
+    const topN = Math.max(1, Math.min(50, parseInt(req.query.top, 10) || 10));
+
+    const out = {};
+    for (const sport of sports) {
+      let grades = null;
+      const snap = await cacheGet(`snapshot:${sport}:latest`);
+      if (snap && Array.isArray(snap.grades)) grades = snap.grades;
+      else {
+        const env = await cacheGet(`grades:${sport}`);
+        if (env && Array.isArray(env.grades)) grades = env.grades;
+      }
+      if (!grades || grades.length === 0) { out[sport] = { note: 'no cached grades' }; continue; }
+      const withPWin = grades.filter((g) => g && g.p_win != null).length;
+      out[sport] = {
+        graded: grades.length,
+        with_p_win: withPWin,
+        // Honest: if p_win is absent the challenger degrades to grade order and
+        // the delta understates. Say so rather than reporting a clean zero.
+        p_win_coverage_pct: grades.length ? Math.round((1000 * withPWin) / grades.length) / 10 : null,
+        ...rankingDelta(grades, topN),
+      };
+    }
+    res.set('Cache-Control', 'no-store');
+    return res.json({ ok: true, live_ordering_unchanged: true, per_sport: out });
+  } catch (err) {
+    return res.status(500).json({ ok: false, error: err && err.message });
+  }
+});
+
 module.exports = router;

src/routes/snapshot.js

@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ const { indexRosterLogs, attachLast10Dots } = require('../services/last10Dots');
 // viewer. This endpoint is PUBLIC, so the Session-66 gate on /api/analyze was
 // being bypassed here on every graded row. Same layer as the CLV gate.
 const { stripModelPrice, gateItemizedGrades, liveLockedSummary, freeSample, entitledToItemizedGrades } = require('../utils/snapshotGating');
+const { rankByForecast, gradeKey } = require('../utils/gradeRanking');
 const { resolveTierFromRequest } = require('../utils/requestTier');
 
 const router = express.Router();
@@ -108,7 +109,27 @@ router.get('/:sport', async (req, res) => {
     // The earlier resolution-flip freed settled grades, which made the free tier a
     // ONE-DAY-DELAYED FEED of the whole product. Order still matters: strip the model
     // PRICE first (S67), then withhold judgment on EVERY itemized grade.
-    const gate = (grades) => gateItemizedGrades(stripModelPrice(grades, tier), tier);
+    // FORECAST RANK (Order: rank on p_win, 2026-08-01) — stamped BEFORE the
+    // model-price strip, so every tier receives the CORRECT ORDER without the
+    // paid values. Same precedent as topGradedService: `p_win` is stripped for
+    // unentitled callers, so a client cannot rank on it; an ordinal can travel
+    // where the magnitude cannot.
+    //
+    // ADDITIVE ONLY IN THIS ORDER. Nothing sorts by it yet — the live ordering
+    // is byte-identical until the flip is reviewed against the recorded delta.
+    // It leaks ordering, not magnitude, which is the same trade already made
+    // and accepted for the top-graded board.
+    const stampForecastRank = (grades) => {
+      if (!Array.isArray(grades) || grades.length === 0) return grades;
+      const ranked = rankByForecast(grades);
+      const pos = new Map();
+      ranked.forEach((g, i) => pos.set(gradeKey(g), i + 1));
+      return grades.map((g) => {
+        const r = pos.get(gradeKey(g));
+        return r == null ? g : { ...g, forecast_rank: r };
+      });
+    };
+    const gate = (grades) => gateItemizedGrades(stripModelPrice(stampForecastRank(grades), tier), tier);
     // Free proof, none of it itemizing the nightly slate:
     //   - the tease: AGGREGATE count + tier shape, computed from the ungated rows and
     //     never joined back to one, so nobody can tell WHICH prop is the A

src/services/altLineScanner.js

@@ -41,9 +41,19 @@ function americanToImplied(odds) {
 
 /**
  * Compare model probability to book implied probability.
- * @param {number} modelProb - Model-calculated probability
- * @param {number} bookOdds - American odds from the book
- * @returns {object} { model_prob, book_implied, edge, value_detected }
+ *
+ * EDGE IS RETIRED AS A DECISION (2026-08-01). `value_detected: edge > 0` used to
+ * declare that a line had value. It cannot: measured on n=200 settled MLB rows,
+ * corr(edge, outcome) = -0.010 under the incumbent ruler and -0.022 under the
+ * consensus ruler, while corr(p_win, outcome) = +0.26. A quantity that does not
+ * predict the outcome must not decide anything the user sees.
+ *
+ * `edge` is STILL COMPUTED AND RETURNED — losing the record would be worse than
+ * mis-using it, and it stays in the ledger as a diagnostic. What is gone is the
+ * verdict derived from it. `value_detected` is now null with an explicit reason,
+ * so a caller that reads it gets an honest absence instead of a false boolean.
+ *
+ * @returns {object} { model_prob, book_implied, edge, value_detected, value_basis }
  */
 function compareToBookImplied(modelProb, bookOdds) {
   const bookImplied = americanToImplied(bookOdds);
@@ -52,16 +62,32 @@ function compareToBookImplied(modelProb, bookOdds) {
   return {
     model_prob: Math.round(modelProb * 1000) / 1000,
     book_implied: Math.round(bookImplied * 1000) / 1000,
+    // DIAGNOSTIC ONLY — never a ranking, gate or quality signal.
     edge: Math.round(edge * 1000) / 1000,
-    value_detected: edge > 0,
+    value_detected: null,
+    value_basis: 'retired:edge_does_not_predict',
   };
 }
 
 /**
- * Scan alternate lines for A-grade props to find optimal value.
- * @param {object} prop - { player, stat, projected_mean, projected_stddev, grade }
- * @param {Array} oddsData - Array of { line, odds, book } from alt markets
- * @returns {object|null} Best alt line with edge, or null
+ * Rank the rungs of an alt-line ladder by the model-vs-price gap.
+ *
+ * ⚠️ THIS MODULE HAS NO CALLERS (verified 2026-08-01) — it is unwired, like
+ * mlbGrader.js. Left in place, made honest, not deleted.
+ *
+ * EDGE IS NO LONGER A VERDICT HERE. This used to `filter(e => e.value_detected)`
+ * and call the survivor `optimal_line`. Both were quality claims that edge
+ * cannot support (n=200 settled MLB: corr(edge, outcome) = -0.010 / -0.022).
+ *
+ * A HONEST NOTE ON WHY THIS ONE IS DIFFERENT. Ranking props AGAINST EACH OTHER
+ * must not use edge — p_win is the measured predictor. But choosing between
+ * RUNGS OF THE SAME PROP is inherently price-relative: every rung has a
+ * different price, and ranking rungs by model probability alone would always
+ * pick the lowest line (P(over 0.5) > P(over 2.5) by construction). So the gap
+ * is kept as the ordering key here — and labelled as an UNVALIDATED price
+ * diagnostic, because we have no evidence it predicts rung outcomes either.
+ *
+ * @returns {object|null} { ranked_lines, ranking_basis, top_by_price_gap, ... }
  */
 function scanAltLines(prop, oddsData) {
   if (!prop || !oddsData || oddsData.length === 0) return null;
@@ -80,24 +106,25 @@ function scanAltLines(prop, oddsData) {
       model_probability: comparison.model_prob,
       book_implied: comparison.book_implied,
       edge: comparison.edge,
-      value_detected: comparison.value_detected,
     };
   });
 
-  const withValue = evaluated.filter(e => e.value_detected);
-  if (withValue.length === 0) return null;
+  if (evaluated.length === 0) return null;
 
-  withValue.sort((a, b) => b.edge - a.edge);
-  const optimal = withValue[0];
+  // No value FILTER: a negative gap is a real observation about a rung, not a
+  // reason to hide it. The whole ladder is returned, ranked, and labelled.
+  const ranked = [...evaluated].sort((a, b) => b.edge - a.edge);
+  const top = ranked[0];
 
   return {
-    optimal_line: optimal.line,
-    odds: optimal.odds,
-    book: optimal.book,
-    model_probability: optimal.model_probability,
-    book_implied: optimal.book_implied,
-    edge: optimal.edge,
-    all_value_lines: withValue,
+    ranking_basis: 'price_gap_diagnostic_unvalidated',
+    top_by_price_gap: top.line,
+    odds: top.odds,
+    book: top.book,
+    model_probability: top.model_probability,
+    book_implied: top.book_implied,
+    edge: top.edge,
+    ranked_lines: ranked,
   };
 }
 

src/utils/gradeRanking.js

@@ -94,6 +94,114 @@ function rankGrades(grades, limit) {
   return limit == null ? out : out.slice(0, Math.max(0, limit));
 }
 
+
+/**
+ * rankByForecast — THE CHALLENGER instrument (2026-08-01).
+ *
+ * WHY THIS EXISTS, measured on n=200 settled MLB rows:
+ *
+ *     corr(p_win,               outcome) = +0.26
+ *     corr(p_win - fair_prob_v1, outcome) = -0.010
+ *     corr(p_win - fair_prob_v2, outcome) = -0.022
+ *
+ * Subtracting the market price DESTROYS the signal, under BOTH rulers. So the
+ * product must rank on the thing that predicts (p_win) and must not rank on
+ * market-relative edge at all. `rankGrades` (the incumbent) keeps edge as its
+ * 4th key; this one has no edge term anywhere.
+ *
+ * ORDER: takeable-gated p_win → grade tier → confidence → stable input order.
+ *
+ * p_win LEADS, grade follows. That inverts the incumbent, and deliberately: the
+ * grade letter measured r ~ 0.005 against outcomes and is INVERTED (B 52.4% <
+ * C 56.9%), while p_win measures +0.26. Leading with the letter would sort the
+ * board by the weaker signal and use the stronger one only to break ties.
+ *
+ * The takeable gate is mandatory and unchanged: raw p_win crowns -300 chalk,
+ * which is not the product.
+ *
+ * ON CALIBRATION: isotonic is a MONOTONE transform, so ranking on raw p_win and
+ * ranking on isotonic-calibrated p_win produce the SAME ORDER. Calibration
+ * matters when p_win is displayed or thresholded — it cannot change a ranking.
+ * Nothing here needs the calibrated value.
+ */
+function rankByForecast(grades, limit) {
+  const arr = (Array.isArray(grades) ? grades : []).filter((g) => g && g.grade);
+  const scored = arr.map((g, idx) => ({
+    g,
+    idx,
+    pWin: takeablePWin(g),
+    rank: gradeRankOf(g.grade),
+    conf: strictNum(g.confidence) == null ? -1 : strictNum(g.confidence),
+  }));
+  scored.sort((a, b) => descNullsLast(a.pWin, b.pWin)
+    || a.rank - b.rank
+    || b.conf - a.conf
+    || a.idx - b.idx);
+  const out = scored.map((s) => s.g);
+  return limit == null ? out : out.slice(0, Math.max(0, limit));
+}
+
+/** Stable identity for a grade row, for comparing two orderings. */
+function gradeKey(g) {
+  if (!g) return '';
+  const player = g.player_name || g.player || '';
+  const stat = g.stat_type || g.stat || '';
+  return `${String(player).toLowerCase()}|${String(stat).toLowerCase()}|${g.line}|${g.direction || ''}`;
+}
+
+/**
+ * rankingDelta — the CHALLENGER-FIRST measurement. How far does the board move
+ * if the instrument changes from `rankGrades` (grade-then-edge) to
+ * `rankByForecast` (p_win-first, no edge)? Pure; changes nothing.
+ */
+function rankingDelta(grades, topN = 10) {
+  const incumbent = rankGrades(grades);
+  const challenger = rankByForecast(grades);
+  const posOf = (list) => {
+    const m = new Map();
+    list.forEach((g, i) => m.set(gradeKey(g), i));
+    return m;
+  };
+  const a = posOf(incumbent);
+  const b = posOf(challenger);
+
+  let moved = 0;
+  let sumAbs = 0;
+  let maxMove = 0;
+  const moves = [];
+  for (const [key, i] of a.entries()) {
+    const j = b.get(key);
+    if (j == null) continue;
+    const d = j - i;
+    if (d !== 0) moved += 1;
+    sumAbs += Math.abs(d);
+    if (Math.abs(d) > Math.abs(maxMove)) maxMove = d;
+    moves.push({ key, from: i + 1, to: j + 1, delta: d });
+  }
+  const n = a.size;
+  const topA = new Set(incumbent.slice(0, topN).map(gradeKey));
+  const topB = new Set(challenger.slice(0, topN).map(gradeKey));
+  let overlap = 0;
+  for (const k of topA) if (topB.has(k)) overlap += 1;
+
+  return {
+    n,
+    moved,
+    moved_pct: n ? Math.round((1000 * moved) / n) / 10 : null,
+    mean_abs_move: n ? Math.round((10 * sumAbs) / n) / 10 : null,
+    max_move: maxMove,
+    top_n: topN,
+    top_n_overlap: overlap,
+    top_n_overlap_pct: topN ? Math.round((1000 * overlap) / topN) / 10 : null,
+    // The headline for a board: does the #1 read change?
+    incumbent_top: incumbent[0] ? gradeKey(incumbent[0]) : null,
+    challenger_top: challenger[0] ? gradeKey(challenger[0]) : null,
+    top_changed: incumbent[0] && challenger[0] ? gradeKey(incumbent[0]) !== gradeKey(challenger[0]) : null,
+    biggest_movers: moves.sort((x, y) => Math.abs(y.delta) - Math.abs(x.delta)).slice(0, 10),
+  };
+}
+
 module.exports = {
   GRADE_RANK, gradeRankOf, strictNum, takeablePWin, descNullsLast, rankGrades,
+  rankByForecast, rankingDelta, gradeKey,
 };

tests/unit/intelligenceEngine.test.js

@@ -150,15 +150,25 @@ describe('Intelligence Engine', () => {
       expect(prob).toBeCloseTo(0.5, 1);
     });
 
-    test('compareToBookImplied detects value', () => {
+    // SUPERSEDED 2026-08-01. This asserted `value_detected === true` from a
+    // positive edge. Edge does not predict outcomes (n=200 settled MLB rows:
+    // corr -0.010 incumbent ruler / -0.022 consensus, vs corr(p_win) = +0.26),
+    // so it must not decide anything. The stronger property: edge is still
+    // COMPUTED and returned as a diagnostic (losing the record would be worse
+    // than mis-using it), while the verdict is an honest null with a reason.
+    test('compareToBookImplied returns edge as a DIAGNOSTIC and refuses a verdict', () => {
       const result = compareToBookImplied(0.60, -110);
       expect(result.model_prob).toBe(0.6);
       expect(result.book_implied).toBeCloseTo(0.524, 2);
-      expect(result.value_detected).toBe(true);
-      expect(result.edge).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+      expect(result.edge).toBeGreaterThan(0);          // still recorded
+      expect(result.value_detected).toBeNull();        // never a boolean verdict
+      expect(result.value_basis).toBe('retired:edge_does_not_predict');
     });
 
-    test('scanAltLines returns optimal line with edge', () => {
+    // SUPERSEDED 2026-08-01: 'optimal' was a quality claim edge cannot support,
+    // and filtering to edge>0 hid rungs. The ladder is now returned whole,
+    // ranked, and labelled as an unvalidated price diagnostic.
+    test('scanAltLines returns the whole ladder ranked, labelled unvalidated', () => {
       const prop = { projected_mean: 25, projected_stddev: 5, direction: 'over' };
       const odds = [
         { line: 22.5, odds: -130, book: 'draftkings' },
@@ -167,8 +177,13 @@ describe('Intelligence Engine', () => {
       ];
       const result = scanAltLines(prop, odds);
       expect(result).not.toBeNull();
-      expect(result.optimal_line).toBeDefined();
-      expect(result.edge).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+      expect(result.top_by_price_gap).toBeDefined();
+      expect(result.ranking_basis).toBe('price_gap_diagnostic_unvalidated');
+      // every rung survives — a negative gap is an observation, not a reason to hide
+      expect(result.ranked_lines).toHaveLength(odds.length);
+      expect(result.ranked_lines[0].edge).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(result.ranked_lines[1].edge);
+      // no boolean verdict anywhere in the payload
+      expect(result.ranked_lines.every((r) => r.value_detected === undefined)).toBe(true);
     });
   });
 

tests/unit/rankingInstrument.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+'use strict';
+
+/**
+ * Ranking instrument — challenger vs incumbent (2026-08-01).
+ *
+ * These lock the reason the challenger exists: measured on n=200 settled MLB
+ * rows, corr(p_win, outcome) = +0.26 while corr(edge, outcome) = -0.010 under
+ * the incumbent ruler and -0.022 under the consensus ruler. A quantity that
+ * does not predict must not rank, gate or decide.
+ */
+
+const {
+  rankGrades, rankByForecast, rankingDelta, gradeKey, takeablePWin,
+} = require('../../src/utils/gradeRanking');
+
+const g = (player, grade, p_win, odds = -110, extra = {}) => ({
+  player, stat_type: 'hits', line: 1.5, direction: 'over',
+  grade, p_win, book_odds: odds, ...extra,
+});
+
+describe('rankByForecast — the challenger', () => {
+  it('contains NO edge term: edge cannot move the order at all', () => {
+    const a = [g('A', 'B', 0.62, -110, { edge: -99 }), g('B', 'B', 0.55, -110, { edge: +99 })];
+    const b = [g('A', 'B', 0.62, -110, { edge: +99 }), g('B', 'B', 0.55, -110, { edge: -99 })];
+    expect(rankByForecast(a).map((x) => x.player)).toEqual(['A', 'B']);
+    expect(rankByForecast(b).map((x) => x.player)).toEqual(['A', 'B']);
+  });
+
+  it('leads with p_win, not the grade letter', () => {
+    // The letter measured r ~ 0.005 and is INVERTED; p_win measures +0.26.
+    // A high-p_win C must outrank a low-p_win A.
+    const out = rankByForecast([g('lowPwinA', 'A', 0.51), g('highPwinC', 'C', 0.74)]);
+    expect(out[0].player).toBe('highPwinC');
+  });
+
+  it('keeps the takeable gate — raw p_win would crown chalk', () => {
+    const chalk = g('chalk', 'A', 0.93, -300);      // untakeable price
+    const real = g('real', 'B', 0.61, -115);
+    expect(takeablePWin(chalk)).toBeNull();
+    expect(rankByForecast([chalk, real])[0].player).toBe('real');
+  });
+
+  it('sorts a missing p_win LAST, never first (Number(null) === 0 guard)', () => {
+    const out = rankByForecast([g('none', 'A', null), g('has', 'C', 0.58)]);
+    expect(out.map((x) => x.player)).toEqual(['has', 'none']);
+  });
+
+  it('is stable for genuinely tied rows', () => {
+    const rows = [g('first', 'B', 0.6), g('second', 'B', 0.6)];
+    expect(rankByForecast(rows).map((x) => x.player)).toEqual(['first', 'second']);
+  });
+
+  it('drops ungraded rows, like the incumbent', () => {
+    expect(rankByForecast([g('x', null, 0.9), g('y', 'B', 0.5)]).map((r) => r.player)).toEqual(['y']);
+  });
+});
+
+describe('rankGrades — the incumbent is UNTOUCHED (live ordering byte-identical)', () => {
+  it('still leads with the grade letter and still consults edge', () => {
+    const out = rankGrades([g('lowPwinA', 'A', 0.51), g('highPwinC', 'C', 0.74)]);
+    expect(out[0].player).toBe('lowPwinA');   // grade-first, unchanged
+  });
+
+  it('edge still breaks a true tie in the incumbent', () => {
+    const out = rankGrades([
+      g('lowEdge', 'B', 0.6, -110, { edge: 1 }),
+      g('highEdge', 'B', 0.6, -110, { edge: 9 }),
+    ]);
+    expect(out[0].player).toBe('highEdge');
+  });
+});
+
+describe('rankingDelta — the challenger-first measurement', () => {
+  it('reports how far the board moves and whether the top read changes', () => {
+    const rows = [g('A', 'A', 0.52), g('B', 'C', 0.77), g('C', 'B', 0.64)];
+    const d = rankingDelta(rows, 3);
+    expect(d.n).toBe(3);
+    expect(d.incumbent_top).toBe(gradeKey(rows[0]));   // A-grade leads incumbent
+    expect(d.challenger_top).toBe(gradeKey(rows[1]));  // highest p_win leads challenger
+    expect(d.top_changed).toBe(true);
+    expect(d.moved).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+  });
+
+  it('reports zero movement when both instruments agree', () => {
+    const rows = [g('A', 'A', 0.80), g('B', 'B', 0.60), g('C', 'C', 0.40)];
+    const d = rankingDelta(rows, 3);
+    expect(d.moved).toBe(0);
+    expect(d.top_changed).toBe(false);
+    expect(d.top_n_overlap_pct).toBe(100);
+  });
+
+  it('changes nothing about the inputs (pure)', () => {
+    const rows = [g('A', 'A', 0.52), g('B', 'C', 0.77)];
+    const snapshot = JSON.stringify(rows);
+    rankingDelta(rows);
+    expect(JSON.stringify(rows)).toBe(snapshot);
+  });
+});