Package specs/design-reference (Jul 22) audited against the CURRENT repo
(bf7c0a3, ~9 days later). No ~/vyndr_design exists; the in-repo copy is the
package. Every claim is a direct file/grep/count check, not the harness that
returned a silent false in Wave 3.
61 implementable items enumerated: BUILT-TO-SPEC 20, BUILT-BUT-DRIFTED 7,
PARTIAL 16, ABSENT 18 (+1 CANNOT DETERMINE: 19-screen mobile parity needs a
visual pass).
Largest single gap: the glyph library — 38 of 83 designed SVGs are wired (46%),
and the design implies 74 display archetypes against a 41-entry backend
registry, so the archetype system is roughly half the designed scope.
Drift found on surfaces built recently: the book comparison wired 07-29 renders
per-book lines but has NO crown, NO disagreement axis, NO SPLIT chip and NO
movement strip — a simpler version than the S2 design. The mobile tab bar has 5
tabs but not the designed READ-FAB. Calibration gating disagrees with the design
(our n>=20 vs designed N30).
Wave-2 reclassification: Newsletter DESIGN EXISTS (S5 The Report is fully
designed) — the earlier status pull was wrong to call it a design gap. Live
tracking and Slip reader remain genuinely design-missing.
Model linkages named: Price Triplet waits on the EV layer producing
p_win/ev_pct/model_odds; the S4 calibration curve waits on the n-threshold
decision plus accrued buckets, while the CLV chips can build on the repaired
instrument now.
Ordered build list in six dependency waves: self-contained first (glyphs,
primitives, boundary-channel blue), then scanner-nudge-gated, model-gated,
resolution-pipeline-gated (share-card masters cannot ship — the tail has no
generation step and no trigger), licensing-gated (book logos, push-to-book),
then the large surface builds.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QJs13VsyiSKYQP6rj3NNmc
