1bdc3baec73eb4cdeadc136818f82b4b64429065
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 builtbykev
|
11277a1b99 |
Materialization truth: a completed write is not a complete cohort
Transport truth says every intended write succeeded. Materialization truth says
every identity that should exist actually exists. The retention writer could
only report the first, and the gap is not theoretical.
THE CONFLICT IDENTITY, traced to the real index:
model_snapshots_cycle_prop_uniq UNIQUE (snapshot_id, player_key, stat, line, side)
written by `upsert(..., { onConflict: same five columns, ignoreDuplicates: true })`.
Measured in production: no key column is ever NULL (0 of 328,262 rows), so
NULLS DISTINCT never applies and the identity is plain column equality. `line`
is an unconstrained numeric, so identity normalises it — 0.5 in and "0.50" out
must not read as two identities for one stored row.
PRIOR-CYCLE COLLISION IS IMPOSSIBLE. `snapshot_id` is in the identity and is a
fresh UUID per cycle, so no row can be suppressed by an earlier cycle.
Append-only chronology across cycles is safe, and `captured_at` is not in the
identity, so a cohort cannot be split by timing.
INTRA-CYCLE COLLISION IS REAL, AND WE CAUSED IT. `canonical_event_id` is NOT in
the identity. A doubleheader — same hitter, same stat, same line, two genuinely
different games — is ONE identity. Demonstrated through the real collector: 4
outbound rows, 2 distinct identities, 2 rows discarded by ignoreDuplicates with
no error, `written` counting all 4 and the terminal status reading COMPLETE.
Before event-aware dedupe the second game was dropped before grading, so the
collision could not arise; that fix moved the loss downstream into retention.
The conflict identity is NOT changed here — that is a separate decision with its
own before/after. This makes the loss visible instead of silent.
EXPECTED vs ACTUAL. `expectedMaterialization(rows)` derives the identity set
from the FINAL outbound payload using the exact database identity — never from
`attempted`, which counts rows sent, not identities that can exist.
`reconcileMaterialization` compares SETS, not counts: two sets of equal size can
still differ, and a cohort that swapped one identity for another passes every
count test ever written. A collision passes set equality by construction (the
discarded row was never in the expected set) while real rows were lost, so
collision_count > 0 fails the cohort on its own.
A cohort is evidence-complete only when transport is COMPLETE, missing = 0,
extra = 0, and collisions = 0.
OBSERVABILITY stayed minimal. `last_retention` was already PER SPORT (a Map
keyed by sport), so no fix was needed there and the route is UNCHANGED — the new
fields ride the existing entry: outbound_rows, expected_materialized_count,
outbound_collision_count, expected_identity_digest. Counts and a digest only,
never the identities, which carry player names. The expected set is the one
materialization fact unrecoverable from the database afterwards, which is why it
is the only thing recorded at runtime.
A collision leaves transport COMPLETE, so the existing failure alert could never
see it. It now has its own high-severity alert naming the counts, the cycle and
the build, and says the cohort is not evidence-complete.
Seven teeth, each injection verified present, against a GREEN baseline of 63:
1 attempted===written as evidence completeness -> 1 fail
2 COUNT(*) equality instead of set equality -> 1 fail
3 snapshot_id dropped from expected identity -> 4 fail
4 unexpected collision allowed to qualify -> 1 fail
5 single global last_retention slot -> 2 fail
6 partial chunk failure treated as usable -> 3 fail
7 collision loses its announcement -> 1 fail
Restored byte-identically (retention 742f116473d97f49, snapshot 81129facbabeb280).
Three brittle assertions repaired, with the reason recorded: two windowed on a
byte count that a neighbouring block outgrew — a test failing because of its
neighbour, not its subject — now windowed to syntactic landmarks; and one
counted TERMINAL.COMPLETE occurrences, which a legitimate comparison
incremented. It now asserts one DECISION and one READ.
persist() and createCollector are BYTE-IDENTICAL. onConflict and
ignoreDuplicates appear in the diff only as prose. Model, event, ledger,
calibration, chain, lineage config, and the status route: UNCHANGED. Zero
lineage/publication files, zero cacheSet changes, zero web paths. Lineage OFF.
Schema contract unchanged: release 64, prod 67, prod-only 3 (debt, not
authorized), missing in prod 0.
384 suites / 5,144 tests pass. web tsc exit 0.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CQJeAG8vcDoL5zkiaJyVb8
|
||
|
builtbykev
|
9809626c99 |
Retention completion: a cohort is complete only when the writer says N of N
The previous bug made the recorder write nothing. The dangerous successor is a
recorder that writes half and looks healthy: persist() writes in chunks of 250
and STOPS AT THE FIRST FAILED CHUNK, so chunks committed before the failure are
already durable. Rows exist under the snapshot_id, captured_at is uniform, Redis
kept working — and the cohort is short.
So row presence was never completion evidence, and neither was a matching
timestamp. Completeness is now proven by the writer or not at all.
TERMINAL RETENTION STATES (retentionService.classifyPersist):
NOTHING_TO_PERSIST attempted 0 — a refusal-only slate is still a cycle
SKIPPED_NO_DATABASE no database configured; not a failure
COMPLETE attempted > 0, written === attempted, no error
FAILED_ZERO_WRITE written === 0 — first chunk failed
FAILED_PARTIAL 0 < written < attempted — a later chunk failed
FAILED_UNRESOLVED_ERROR counts look complete but an error is unresolved;
unreachable through today's loop, and kept because
the alternative is reporting COMPLETE holding an error
The invariant: any written < attempted with attempted > 0 is a FAILED cycle. A
partial cohort is never degraded success.
classifyPersist reads the EXACT persist() result and refuses anything else — it
never recomputes attempted or written, because a second calculation could
disagree with the writer and then the status would describe a cycle that did not
happen. persist() itself is byte-identical to
|