be8e16aca916a86700985edb8c5633ed0799b0a8
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 builtbykev
|
556d186ff1 |
One evaluator for the shadow, so the probe cannot report a mode the pipeline is not in
"Is the shadow effective?" was only answerable by waiting for a snapshot to write a row. That leaves a blind spot with real cost: a variable SET IN COOLIFY BUT NOT YET APPLIED to the running process is indistinguishable from an unset one, and the runtime probe already proves the distinction matters — code_sha |
||
|
builtbykev
|
22cf51c4b0 |
The mapping that ran now has a name, and the row carries it
Runtime probes say the fleet is on
|
||
|
builtbykev
|
a8de676756 |
A probability is served because evidence supports it, not because nothing else answered
The band gate was blocked for its `else` branch. It read:
candidate = F(raw)
served = inCertifiedBand(candidate) ? candidate : RAW
and above raw 0.60 the model is measured overconfident — holdout raw 0.80-0.90
predicts 0.843 and realizes 0.639. So "the calibrator is not supported here" was
being answered with a number already proven wrong. Unsupported calibration does
not make raw true.
Four candidates were adjudicated on ONE split — fit on the earliest 60% of
train, decide support on the last 40%, evaluate on a holdout that saw neither:
A low-param 80.2% coverage 0.24374 REFUTED — its extra region
(raw 0.80-0.90) certified on cert (err +0.040, n=55) and
refuted on holdout (served 0.754 vs observed 0.639), and it
leaves a hole at 0.70-0.80 while serving the island above it
B isotonic 91.3% coverage 0.24337 CERTIFIED, contiguous raw [0.50,0.80)
C empirical band 91.3% coverage 0.24335 REFUTED — refitted point-in-time on
current-model hits the realized rates INVERT in grade order
(B+ 0.593 < B 0.614 < C+ 0.623), so the served function steps
down at raw 0.78. Its shipped constants come from 3,417 props
pooled across four batter stats and do not reproduce here
D raw identity 43.1% coverage 0.24866 certifies raw 0.50-0.60 and only there
Raw is candidate D, not a fallback. It earns exactly one region (holdout error
+0.010 on n=1,316), which is why the law is "raw must earn its region" rather
than "raw is never true". B already covers that region, so no hybrid is built.
Above raw 0.80 nothing is certified and nothing is served. That is the region
where raw is most wrong, isotonic over-corrects (cert err -0.093) and its LODO
mapping at 0.95 has spread 0.180. 8.7% of holdout rows land there.
The registry did not need changing. `serves(stat, p)` already tested certified
bands against the RAW p_win — support in the input domain, the correct question —
and returned {serve:false, reason}. It never said "serve raw". The output-space
gate and the raw fallback were both invented downstream in calibrationService.
ACTIVATION IS OFF. PROBABILITY_CONTRACT_SHADOW defaults to 0, CALIBRATION_DEPLOYED
stays frozen empty, and every served field is byte-identical. This releases the
support first, which is the required order. The shadow records raw belief, the
candidate served value, the state, the estimator identity, and what EV/Kelly/VALUE
would be under the actionability law — into its own column, read by nothing.
Migration 051 was applied to production BEFORE retentionService named the column.
PostgREST builds a bulk insert from the first row's shape, so a key whose column
does not exist 400s the whole batch silently — that is how migration 038 took
retention down for three days.
The user-facing contradiction is NOT fixed here. A B+ still says "realized about
66%" beside a confidence of 84. Fixing that is activation, and activation costs
32% of VALUE flags and 46% of Kelly recommendations on the holdout.
Suite 401/401, 5,580 passed, 4 skipped, deterministic across three runs.
Teeth 23/23, each independently injected and restored byte-identically.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CQJeAG8vcDoL5zkiaJyVb8
|