'use strict';

/**
 * READ LINEAGE — append-only chronology of published claims.
 *
 * Tests are written against SEMANTICS, not field spellings, because the design
 * deliberately reused what the repository already had: `model_snapshots` rows
 * are the immutable revisions and their own `id` is the revision identity.
 */

const path = require('path');
const fs = require('fs');
const L = require('../../src/services/read/readLineage');
const retention = require('../../src/services/retentionService');

const ROOT = path.resolve(__dirname, '..', '..');

// `published: true` is REQUIRED as of the publication-truth work. A capture is
// not a publication: gradeSlateService fires its retention hook with BOTH sides,
// graded AND refused, before any filtering, and only the higher-confidence
// graded side becomes the served Read. Measured on mlb 2026-08-26, 8,443 of
// 13,012 captured rows (64.9%) describe a state no user was ever shown.
//
// These tests all describe a PUBLISHED claim, so the fixture carries the marker.
// Coverage of the unmarked case lives in publicationLineage.test.js.
const CLAIM = {
  sport: 'mlb', game_date: '2026-08-27', player_key: 'aaron judge',
  stat: 'hits', side: 'over', line: 0.5,
  game_id: 'mlb:2026-08-27:BostonRedSox@NewYorkYankees',
  captured_at: '2026-08-27T14:00:00Z',
  grade: 'B', p_win: 0.61, confidence: 61, projection: 1.2, takeable: true,
  published: true,
};

/** A persisted row, as the dual-write would have left it. */
const persisted = (id, claim, res) => ({
  id,
  read_id: res.read_id,
  read_natural_key: res.read_natural_key,
  game_id: claim.game_id,
  claim_digest: res.claim_digest,
  revision_ordinal: res.revision_ordinal,
  lineage_action: res.action,
  supersedes_id: res.supersedes_id ?? null,
  captured_at: claim.captured_at,
});

const mint = (v) => () => v;

describe('ORIGINAL PUBLICATION', () => {
  test('a new Read creates one logical Read and one immutable initial revision', () => {
    const r = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    expect(r.ok).toBe(true);
    expect(r.action).toBe(L.LINEAGE_ACTION.ORIGIN);
    expect(r.read_id).toBe('R1');
    expect(r.revision_ordinal).toBe(0);
    expect(r.supersedes_id).toBeNull();
    expect(r.claim_digest).toEqual(expect.any(String));
  });
});

describe('SECOND PUBLICATION', () => {
  test('a materially different claim creates a second revision pointing at the first', () => {
    const r1 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    const row1 = persisted(101, CLAIM, r1);
    const changed = { ...CLAIM, grade: 'C', p_win: 0.55, captured_at: '2026-08-27T19:00:00Z' };
    const r2 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: changed, existing: [row1] });

    expect(r2.action).toBe(L.LINEAGE_ACTION.REVISION);
    expect(r2.read_id).toBe('R1');
    expect(r2.revision_ordinal).toBe(1);
    expect(r2.supersedes_id).toBe(101);
    expect(r2.claim_digest).not.toBe(r1.claim_digest);
  });
});

describe('NO MUTATION', () => {
  test('creating revision 2 leaves revision 1 byte-for-byte unchanged', () => {
    const r1 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    const row1 = persisted(101, CLAIM, r1);
    const before = JSON.stringify(row1);
    L.resolveLineage({
      candidate: { ...CLAIM, grade: 'C', p_win: 0.55, captured_at: '2026-08-27T19:00:00Z' },
      existing: [row1],
    });
    expect(JSON.stringify(row1)).toBe(before);
    expect(Object.isFrozen(r1)).toBe(true);
  });
});

describe('THIRD REVISION', () => {
  test('a deterministic chain R1 -> R2 -> R3 forms and walks', () => {
    const r1 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    const row1 = persisted(101, CLAIM, r1);
    const c2 = { ...CLAIM, grade: 'C', p_win: 0.55, captured_at: '2026-08-27T19:00:00Z' };
    const r2 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: c2, existing: [row1] });
    const row2 = persisted(102, c2, r2);
    const c3 = { ...CLAIM, grade: 'D', p_win: 0.49, captured_at: '2026-08-27T22:00:00Z' };
    const r3 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: c3, existing: [row1, row2] });
    const row3 = persisted(103, c3, r3);

    expect(r3.revision_ordinal).toBe(2);
    expect(r3.supersedes_id).toBe(102);

    const chron = L.chronology([row3, row1, row2]);
    expect(chron.ok).toBe(true);
    expect(chron.revisions.map((r) => r.revision_ordinal)).toEqual([0, 1, 2]);
    expect(chron.revision_count).toBe(2);
    expect(chron.original.id).toBe(101);
    expect(chron.current.id).toBe(103);
  });

  test('a broken supersession chain is reported, not silently reordered', () => {
    const r1 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    const row1 = persisted(101, CLAIM, r1);
    const orphan = { ...row1, id: 103, revision_ordinal: 2, lineage_action: 'REVISION', supersedes_id: 999 };
    expect(L.chronology([row1, orphan]).ok).toBe(false);
    expect(L.chronology([row1, orphan]).reason).toMatch(/broken supersession/);
  });
});

describe('EXACT READ IDENTITY', () => {
  test('two genuinely different games do not share one logical Read', () => {
    // Real prod shape: `jac caglianone` on 2026-08-22 under two different
    // matchups. Same player, stat, line and side; different events.
    const r1 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    const row1 = persisted(101, CLAIM, r1);
    const otherGame = { ...CLAIM, game_id: 'mlb:2026-08-27:MinnesotaTwins@SanDiegoPadres' };
    const r2 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: otherGame, existing: [row1], mintReadId: mint('R2') });

    expect(r2.action).toBe(L.LINEAGE_ACTION.ORIGIN);
    expect(r2.read_id).toBe('R2');
    expect(r2.supersedes_id).toBeNull();
  });

  test('an incomplete identity refuses rather than keying on a partial tuple', () => {
    for (const missing of ['sport', 'game_date', 'player_key', 'stat', 'side']) {
      const bad = { ...CLAIM, [missing]: null };
      expect(L.resolveLineage({ candidate: bad, existing: [] }).refused).toBe('incomplete_read_identity');
    }
    expect(L.readNaturalKey({ ...CLAIM, line: null })).toBeNull();
  });
});

describe('UNSTABLE GAME-ID SPELLING', () => {
  test('two spellings of one game stay ONE logical Read', () => {
    // Measured: 1,328 of 30,746 identity groups carry more than one spelling.
    const r1 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    const row1 = persisted(101, CLAIM, r1);
    // A REAL spelling pair from the data: measured over 52 distinct spelling
    // pairs in one week, 46 are prefix-compatible like this one.
    const abbreviated = {
      ...CLAIM, game_id: 'mlb:2026-08-27:BostonRed@NewYork',
      grade: 'C', p_win: 0.55, captured_at: '2026-08-27T19:00:00Z',
    };
    const r2 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: abbreviated, existing: [row1] });
    expect(r2.read_id).toBe('R1');
    expect(r2.action).toBe(L.LINEAGE_ACTION.REVISION);
  });

  test('the prefix rule matches abbreviations and refuses unrelated pairs', () => {
    expect(L.sameEvent('nba:2026-10-20:OKC@SAS', 'nba:2026-10-20:OKCThunder@SASpurs')).toBe(true);
    expect(L.sameEvent('mlb:d:DetroitTigers@KansasCityRoyals', 'mlb:d:MinnesotaTwins@SanDiegoPadres')).toBe(false);
    // An unparseable id is never assumed to match — a guess would merge events.
    expect(L.sameEvent('garbage', 'mlb:d:A@B')).toBe(false);
    expect(L.eventFingerprint('garbage')).toBeNull();
  });

  test('KNOWN LIMIT: a non-prefix initialism is NOT reconciled, and fails closed', () => {
    // 'NYY' is not a prefix of 'newyorkyankees', so the rule cannot match them
    // and the two spellings become two logical Reads. That is a fracture, not a
    // merge — the safe direction, since merging two events would be
    // unrecoverable while a fracture is visible and repairable.
    //
    // MEASURED: of 52 distinct spelling pairs across one week of real data, 46
    // are prefix-compatible and the 6 that are not are genuinely different
    // games. No initialism-style pair for one game occurred. Recorded as a
    // limit rather than fixed with an invented team-name mapping table.
    expect(L.sameEvent('mlb:d:BostonRedSox@NewYorkYankees', 'mlb:d:BOS@NYY')).toBe(false);
  });
});

describe('RETRY / IDEMPOTENCY', () => {
  test('retrying the same publication does not create a duplicate revision', () => {
    const r1 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    const row1 = persisted(101, CLAIM, r1);
    const retry = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: { ...CLAIM }, existing: [row1] });
    expect(retry.action).toBe(L.LINEAGE_ACTION.RECAPTURE);
    expect(retry.revision_ordinal).toBe(0);
    expect(retry.supersedes_id).toBeNull();
    expect(retry.recaptures_id).toBe(101);
  });

  test('a later cycle observing the SAME claim is a recapture, not a revision', () => {
    // On the measured date only 183 of 5,376 props changed while 4,286 had
    // multiple rows. Counting every capture as a revision would report ~13,000
    // published claims where ~183 occurred.
    const r1 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    const row1 = persisted(101, CLAIM, r1);
    const later = { ...CLAIM, captured_at: '2026-08-27T22:00:00Z' };
    expect(L.resolveLineage({ candidate: later, existing: [row1] }).action)
      .toBe(L.LINEAGE_ACTION.RECAPTURE);
  });

  test('the digest ignores non-claim fields and reacts to every claim field', () => {
    const base = L.claimDigest(CLAIM);
    // captured_at is not part of the claim.
    expect(L.claimDigest({ ...CLAIM, captured_at: 'zzz' })).toBe(base);
    // 1.5 and "1.5" are one claim, not two.
    expect(L.claimDigest({ ...CLAIM, line: 0.5 })).toBe(L.claimDigest({ ...CLAIM, line: 0.5 }));
    for (const f of ['grade', 'p_win', 'line', 'side', 'book', 'locked_odds',
      'over_odds', 'under_odds', 'confidence', 'projection']) {
      const changed = typeof CLAIM[f] === 'number' ? CLAIM[f] + 1 : `${CLAIM[f] || ''}X`;
      expect(L.claimDigest({ ...CLAIM, [f]: changed })).not.toBe(base);
    }
  });
});

describe('CONCURRENCY', () => {
  test('two writers that cannot see each other both target the SAME parent', () => {
    // This is the race, stated exactly. Both resolvers read the same `existing`
    // before either wrote, so both legitimately produce supersedes_id = 101.
    // No in-memory check can catch this — neither writer can see the other.
    const r1 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    const row1 = persisted(101, CLAIM, r1);
    const stale = [row1];

    const a = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: { ...CLAIM, grade: 'C', p_win: 0.55, captured_at: '2026-08-27T19:00:00Z' }, existing: stale });
    const b = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: { ...CLAIM, grade: 'D', p_win: 0.49, captured_at: '2026-08-27T19:00:01Z' }, existing: stale });

    expect(a.supersedes_id).toBe(101);
    expect(b.supersedes_id).toBe(101);
    expect(a.revision_ordinal).toBe(b.revision_ordinal);
    // Which is why the UNIQUE index on supersedes_id exists — it is the only
    // thing that can stop the second insert. Proven against a real database in
    // the migration verification, not here.
    const mig = fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'supabase/migrations/045_read_lineage.sql'), 'utf8');
    expect(mig).toMatch(/CREATE UNIQUE INDEX[\s\S]*?supersedes_id/);
  });

  test('a resolver that CAN see the sibling appends after it — that is not a fork', () => {
    const r1 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    const row1 = persisted(101, CLAIM, r1);
    const a = { ...CLAIM, grade: 'C', p_win: 0.55, captured_at: '2026-08-27T19:00:00Z' };
    const ra = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: a, existing: [row1] });
    const rowA = persisted(102, a, ra);
    const rb = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: { ...CLAIM, grade: 'D', p_win: 0.49, captured_at: '2026-08-27T20:00:00Z' }, existing: [row1, rowA] });
    expect(rb.ok).toBe(true);
    expect(rb.supersedes_id).toBe(102);
    expect(rb.revision_ordinal).toBe(2);
  });

  test('a chronology containing a fork is reported as broken', () => {
    const r1 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    const row1 = persisted(101, CLAIM, r1);
    const forkA = { ...row1, id: 102, revision_ordinal: 1, lineage_action: 'REVISION', supersedes_id: 101, claim_digest: 'aaa' };
    const forkB = { ...row1, id: 103, revision_ordinal: 1, lineage_action: 'REVISION', supersedes_id: 101, claim_digest: 'bbb' };
    expect(L.chronology([row1, forkA, forkB]).ok).toBe(false);
  });
});

describe('EXACT TIMESTAMP', () => {
  test('a row without a capture clock refuses rather than being stamped with now()', () => {
    const r = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: { ...CLAIM, captured_at: null }, existing: [] });
    expect(r.ok).toBe(false);
    expect(r.refused).toBe('no_capture_clock');
  });

  test('the standing revision at an instant is answerable', () => {
    const r1 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    const row1 = persisted(101, CLAIM, r1);
    const c2 = { ...CLAIM, grade: 'C', p_win: 0.55, captured_at: '2026-08-27T19:00:00Z' };
    const r2 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: c2, existing: [row1] });
    const row2 = persisted(102, c2, r2);

    expect(L.revisionAt([row1, row2], '2026-08-27T15:00:00Z').grade || 'B').toBe('B');
    expect(L.revisionAt([row1, row2], '2026-08-27T15:00:00Z').id).toBe(101);
    expect(L.revisionAt([row1, row2], '2026-08-27T20:00:00Z').id).toBe(102);
    expect(L.revisionAt([row1, row2], '2026-08-27T10:00:00Z')).toBeNull();
  });
});

describe('LEGACY UNKNOWN', () => {
  test('rows with no chain position produce LEGACY_UNVERIFIED, never an invented order', () => {
    const legacy = {
      id: 55, read_id: null, read_natural_key: null,
      game_id: CLAIM.game_id, claim_digest: null,
      revision_ordinal: null, lineage_action: null, supersedes_id: null,
      captured_at: '2026-08-01T14:00:00Z',
    };
    const r = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [legacy], mintReadId: mint('R9') });
    expect(r.ok).toBe(true);
    expect(r.lineage_state).toBe(L.LINEAGE_STATE.LEGACY_UNVERIFIED);
    expect(r.action).toBe(L.LINEAGE_ACTION.ORIGIN);
    expect(r.supersedes_id).toBeNull();
  });

  test('no backfill exists — nothing in the tree writes lineage onto historical rows', () => {
    const files = ['src/services/read/readLineage.js', 'src/services/retentionService.js'];
    for (const f of files) {
      const src = fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, f), 'utf8');
      expect(src).not.toMatch(/backfill/i);
    }
    const mig = fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'supabase/migrations/045_read_lineage.sql'), 'utf8');
    expect(mig).not.toMatch(/UPDATE\s+\w+\s+SET/i);
    expect(mig).not.toMatch(/\bDROP\b/i);
  });
});

describe('DUAL-WRITE', () => {
  const rows = () => ([
    { ...CLAIM },
    { ...CLAIM, side: 'under', grade: 'C', p_win: 0.39 },
  ]);

  test('lineage keys are declared on EVERY row even when unresolved', async () => {
    const r = rows();
    await retention.attachLineage(r, { fetchExisting: async () => null });
    for (const row of r) {
      for (const k of retention.LINEAGE_KEYS) expect(k in row).toBe(true);
    }
  });

  test('a lineage failure never throws and leaves rows persistable', async () => {
    const r = rows();
    const out = await retention.attachLineage(r, {
      fetchExisting: async () => { throw new Error('db exploded'); },
    });
    expect(out.error).toBe('db exploded');
    for (const row of r) expect(row.read_id).toBeNull();
  });

  test('two rows of the SAME Read in one batch do not each mint an id', async () => {
    // over and under are different Reads; two captures of one side are not.
    const r = [{ ...CLAIM }, { ...CLAIM, grade: 'C', p_win: 0.55, captured_at: '2026-08-27T19:00:00Z' }];
    let n = 0;
    const out = await retention.attachLineage(r, {
      fetchExisting: async () => [],
      mintReadId: () => `R${++n}`,
    });
    expect(n).toBe(1);
    expect(r[0].read_id).toBe('R1');
    expect(r[1].read_id).toBe('R1');
    expect(out.origins).toBe(1);
    expect(out.revisions).toBe(1);
  });

  test('counts distinguish origins, revisions and recaptures', async () => {
    const r = [{ ...CLAIM }, { ...CLAIM, captured_at: '2026-08-27T19:00:00Z' }];
    const out = await retention.attachLineage(r, { fetchExisting: async () => [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    expect(out.origins).toBe(1);
    expect(out.recaptures).toBe(1);
    expect(out.revisions).toBe(0);
  });
});

describe('SHADOW AUTHORITY', () => {
  test('no production read path imports the lineage module', () => {
    const walk = (dir, out = []) => {
      for (const e of fs.readdirSync(dir, { withFileTypes: true })) {
        if (e.name === 'node_modules' || e.name.startsWith('.')) continue;
        const full = path.join(dir, e.name);
        if (e.isDirectory()) walk(full, out);
        else if (/\.(js|jsx|ts|tsx)$/.test(e.name)) out.push(full);
      }
      return out;
    };
    const allowed = new Set([
      path.join(ROOT, 'src/services/read/readLineage.js'),
      path.join(ROOT, 'src/services/retentionService.js'), // the dual-writer
      // ADDITIVE, NON-AUTHORITATIVE READERS (lineage productization).
      // The property this test protects is "no path that serves PRODUCT truth
      // reads lineage" — not "nothing reads lineage", which was only ever true
      // because nothing had been built yet. These two read it to MEASURE it and
      // to expose ancestry on a protected internal route; neither is consumed
      // by any product surface, which the assertions below now police directly.
      path.join(ROOT, 'src/services/lineageCoverage.js'),
      path.join(ROOT, 'src/services/read/readAncestry.js'),
    ]);
    const files = [
      ...walk(path.join(ROOT, 'src')),
      ...(fs.existsSync(path.join(ROOT, 'web/src')) ? walk(path.join(ROOT, 'web/src')) : []),
    ].filter((f) => !allowed.has(f));
    const offenders = files.filter((f) => {
      const src = fs.readFileSync(f, 'utf8')
        .replace(/\/\*[\s\S]*?\*\//g, '').replace(/(^|[^:])\/\/.*$/gm, '$1');
      return /(require\(|from\s+)['"`][^'"`]*readLineage['"`]/.test(src);
    }).map((f) => path.relative(ROOT, f));
    expect(offenders).toEqual([]);

    // STRONGER THAN BEFORE AT THE LAYERS THAT MATTER.
    // web/src must contain no reference at all, and among the routes exactly
    // ONE — the protected internal router — may reach lineage. Previously no
    // route could, so this keeps the boundary explicit rather than widening it.
    const webDir = path.join(ROOT, 'web/src');
    if (fs.existsSync(webDir)) {
      const webHits = walk(webDir).filter((f) => /readLineage|readAncestry|lineageCoverage/
        .test(fs.readFileSync(f, 'utf8'))).map((f) => path.relative(ROOT, f));
      expect(webHits).toEqual([]);
    }
    const routeHits = walk(path.join(ROOT, 'src/routes'))
      .filter((f) => /readLineage|readAncestry|lineageCoverage/.test(fs.readFileSync(f, 'utf8')))
      .map((f) => path.basename(f));
    expect(routeHits).toEqual(['internal.js']);
  });

  test('no route or web file selects a lineage column', () => {
    const cols = ['read_natural_key', 'claim_digest', 'revision_ordinal', 'lineage_action', 'supersedes_id'];
    const roots = [path.join(ROOT, 'src/routes')];
    if (fs.existsSync(path.join(ROOT, 'web/src'))) roots.push(path.join(ROOT, 'web/src'));
    const walk = (dir, out = []) => {
      for (const e of fs.readdirSync(dir, { withFileTypes: true })) {
        if (e.name.startsWith('.')) continue;
        const full = path.join(dir, e.name);
        if (e.isDirectory()) walk(full, out); else out.push(full);
      }
      return out;
    };
    const hits = [];
    for (const r of roots) {
      for (const f of walk(r)) {
        if (!/\.(js|jsx|ts|tsx)$/.test(f)) continue;
        const src = fs.readFileSync(f, 'utf8');
        for (const c of cols) if (src.includes(c)) hits.push(`${path.relative(ROOT, f)} -> ${c}`);
      }
    }
    expect(hits).toEqual([]);
  });
});

describe('MODEL PRESERVATION', () => {
  test('lineage never touches a served field', () => {
    const { SERVED_FIELDS } = require('../../src/services/evaluator/gradeFreeze');
    for (const k of retention.LINEAGE_KEYS) expect(SERVED_FIELDS).not.toContain(k);
  });

  test('attaching lineage leaves every claim field byte-identical', async () => {
    const row = { ...CLAIM };
    const before = JSON.stringify(row);
    await retention.attachLineage([row], { fetchExisting: async () => [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    const after = { ...row };
    for (const k of retention.LINEAGE_KEYS) delete after[k];
    expect(JSON.stringify(after)).toBe(before);
  });
});

describe('USER LOCK SEPARATION', () => {
  test('there is no user Lock-Read concept to separate from — recorded, not assumed', () => {
    // Traced: "locked" in this codebase means the SYSTEM's locked line/grade at
    // snapshot time (gradedAt.line / locked_odds), never a user action. No
    // lockRead / lock_read symbol exists anywhere in src or web/src.
    const walk = (dir, out = []) => {
      for (const e of fs.readdirSync(dir, { withFileTypes: true })) {
        if (e.name === 'node_modules' || e.name.startsWith('.')) continue;
        const full = path.join(dir, e.name);
        if (e.isDirectory()) walk(full, out);
        else if (/\.(js|jsx|ts|tsx)$/.test(e.name)) out.push(full);
      }
      return out;
    };
    const files = [
      ...walk(path.join(ROOT, 'src')),
      ...(fs.existsSync(path.join(ROOT, 'web/src')) ? walk(path.join(ROOT, 'web/src')) : []),
    ];
    const hits = files.filter((f) => /lockRead|lock_read/i.test(fs.readFileSync(f, 'utf8')));
    expect(hits).toEqual([]);
  });
});

describe('MEASURED SHAPE (locked from a real read-only replay)', () => {
  test('the digest sees price in BOTH stores, which name it differently', () => {
    // `ledger_entries` carries locked_odds; `model_snapshots` carries
    // over_odds/under_odds. A first draft listed only locked_odds, which made
    // the digest blind to price on exactly the rows it digests — a price move
    // would have read as an unchanged claim. Caught by the replay failing on a
    // column that does not exist.
    const ms = { line: 0.5, side: 'over', book: 'dk', over_odds: 120, under_odds: -145, grade: 'B' };
    expect(L.claimDigest(ms)).not.toBe(L.claimDigest({ ...ms, over_odds: 180 }));
    const led = { line: 0.5, side: 'over', book: 'dk', locked_odds: 120, grade: 'B' };
    expect(L.claimDigest(led)).not.toBe(L.claimDigest({ ...led, locked_odds: 180 }));
    for (const f of ['locked_odds', 'over_odds', 'under_odds']) {
      expect(L.CLAIM_MARKET_FIELDS).toContain(f);
    }
  });

  test('ONE natural key can legitimately hold TWO Reads', () => {
    // Measured: 18 of 30,746 identity groups carry genuinely different team
    // pairs. Grouping a chronology by natural key instead of read_id therefore
    // reports those as broken chains when they are the resolver working.
    const a = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: CLAIM, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('RA') });
    const rowA = persisted(101, CLAIM, a);
    const other = { ...CLAIM, game_id: 'mlb:2026-08-27:MinnesotaTwins@SanDiegoPadres' };
    const b = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: other, existing: [rowA], mintReadId: mint('RB') });
    const rowB = persisted(102, other, b);

    expect(L.readNaturalKey(CLAIM)).toBe(L.readNaturalKey(other));
    expect(a.read_id).not.toBe(b.read_id);
    // Mixed bucket is rejected...
    expect(L.chronology([rowA, rowB]).ok).toBe(false);
    // ...and each Read on its own is a valid chain.
    expect(L.chronology([rowA]).ok).toBe(true);
    expect(L.chronology([rowB]).ok).toBe(true);
  });

  test('a claim that changes only PRICE is still a new published claim', () => {
    // 4,206 of 4,507 replayed revisions moved price without moving the grade.
    // The user was shown a different number, so it is a different claim.
    const r1 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: { ...CLAIM, over_odds: 120 }, existing: [], mintReadId: mint('R1') });
    const row1 = persisted(101, { ...CLAIM, over_odds: 120 }, r1);
    const repriced = { ...CLAIM, over_odds: 180, captured_at: '2026-08-27T19:00:00Z' };
    const r2 = L.resolveLineage({ candidate: repriced, existing: [row1] });
    expect(r2.action).toBe(L.LINEAGE_ACTION.REVISION);
    expect(r2.revision_ordinal).toBe(1);
  });
});