43f65d30cb
inconclusive THE BUG THIS NEARLY SHIPPED AS A FINDING. The first audit reported 0 factors fired on all 1,140 rows. Not a result -- my paging helper ordered by `id`, and batter_spray, team_defense, platoon_splits and statcast_aggregates have composite primary keys with NO id column. The query errored, the loop broke on error, and four fully-populated tables read as empty. hitsFactorContext.js -- the PRODUCTION loader -- had the identical defect, so live wiring would have loaded nothing and served unadjusted while logging success. Third occurrence of this class in one session. Both loaders now order by a real column and THROW rather than degrade. The Phase 2 gate is what caught it: no resolution number was quoted until transmission was proved. PHASE 1 — pipeline is now base -> FACTORS -> CALIBRATE -> GRADE. Context built in snapshotService BEFORE gradeAndCacheSlate (was line 640+, grade at 454), threaded per prop, applied to p_over before p_win is set with p_win_prefactor and a full trace retained. Hits only. Coverage 859/1140 rows (75%): 474 with all three factors, 256 two, 129 one, 281 none. PHASE 2 — TRANSMISSION PROVEN, 12/12 sign-correct, 4/4 per factor, each applied IN ISOLATION. My first table compared each factor's expected sign against the COMPOSITE change and showed 3 false failures -- with three factors firing the net can oppose any single member; that was a flaw in the test, not the wiring. Two under-side rows confirm the flip is handled: a factor raising p(over) correctly lowers p_win. Switch hitters (Bailey, Bell, Rocchio) took no spray adjustment while their other factors fired normally -- the refusal is selective, not a blanket skip. PHASE 3/4 — both maps refit on the factor-adjusted forecast; the shadow-duel baseline is VOID and restarts, since it accumulated against a different forecast. Point-in-time, 765 held-out rows: reliability 0.00795 -> 0.00828 RESOLUTION 0.00229 -> 0.00345 (variance explained 0.93% -> 1.39%) Brier 0.25398 -> 0.25305 delta -0.00093 CI [-0.00225,+0.00002] Resolution rose 51% relative. The CI TOUCHES ZERO on 4 eval dates, so the composition does NOT earn a proven keep -- three isolated passes did not grant a composed pass. INCONCLUSIVE, reported as such. The gain is far below the sum of the isolated effects, which is expected: all three run through the same pitcher-batter confrontation and share signal. PHASE 5 — 1.39% of variance is still far below what band separation needs. The pivot was correct and incomplete: the plumbing defect was real and is fixed, three proven factors reach the served number for the first time, and transmission alone did not buy grade separation. Next arc is factor STRENGTH and BREADTH, not more plumbing. PHASE 6 — rbi anomaly logged, not chased: 14.51% variance explained vs hits 1.03%, on the stat we do not serve corrected and which has no proven factors. Either the biggest lever on the board or a mirage; it deserves its own order. The byte-identical invariant INVERTED for hits by design. All 13 frozen non-hits modules verified unchanged, probabilityEstimator included -- the factors ride outside it. No new Bonferroni slot; the composed OOS claim is reported with its CI and not claimed as a pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01W1sivYNqY2TS5ftykmHBU9
89 lines
4.1 KiB
JavaScript
89 lines
4.1 KiB
JavaScript
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* The three proven hits factors, on the serving path at last.
|
|
*
|
|
* What these lock: the SIGN each factor moves the forecast, and that every
|
|
* unreadable case leaves it completely alone. A factor that nudges toward a
|
|
* default on missing input is fabricating a read from an absence.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const hf = require('../../src/services/model/hitsFactors');
|
|
|
|
const pullGround = { pull_gb: 0.45, straight_gb: 0.10, oppo_gb: 0.05, pull_air: 0.20, straight_air: 0.12, oppo_air: 0.08 };
|
|
const pos = (o) => Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(o).map(([k, v]) => [k, { oaa: v, fielders: 2 }]));
|
|
const side = (avg, pa) => ({ pa, atBats: Math.round(pa * 0.9), hits: Math.round(pa * 0.9 * avg) });
|
|
const bigSplit = { vl: side(0.284, 183), vr: side(0.221, 291) };
|
|
|
|
describe('each factor moves the forecast in the direction it proved', () => {
|
|
it('TOUGH spray defence lowers the hit forecast', () => {
|
|
const eliteLeft = pos({ '3B': 12, SS: 10, '1B': 0, '2B': 0, LF: 0, CF: 0, RF: 0 });
|
|
const out = hf.adjustProbability(0.6, { spray: pullGround, bats: 'R', positionOaa: eliteLeft });
|
|
expect(out.p_adjusted).toBeLessThan(0.6);
|
|
expect(out.applied.map((a) => a.factor)).toContain('defense_by_direction');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a CONTACT-ALLOWING pitcher raises it; a bat-misser lowers it', () => {
|
|
const soft = hf.adjustProbability(0.6, { pitcherHardHit: 0.46 });
|
|
const tough = hf.adjustProbability(0.6, { pitcherHardHit: 0.31 });
|
|
expect(soft.p_adjusted).toBeGreaterThan(0.6);
|
|
expect(tough.p_adjusted).toBeLessThan(0.6);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a PLATOON disadvantage lowers it, the edge raises it', () => {
|
|
const edge = hf.adjustProbability(0.6, { platoonSplits: bigSplit, bats: 'R', throws: 'L' });
|
|
const wrongSide = hf.adjustProbability(0.6, { platoonSplits: bigSplit, bats: 'R', throws: 'R' });
|
|
expect(edge.p_adjusted).toBeGreaterThan(0.6);
|
|
expect(wrongSide.p_adjusted).toBeLessThan(0.6);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('unreadable means UNTOUCHED, never nudged to a default', () => {
|
|
it('a SWITCH hitter gets no spray adjustment', () => {
|
|
const out = hf.adjustProbability(0.6, { spray: pullGround, bats: 'S', positionOaa: pos({ '3B': 12, SS: 10 }) });
|
|
expect(out.applied.find((a) => a.factor === 'defense_by_direction')).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(out.skipped.map((s) => s.factor)).toContain('defense_by_direction');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a THIN platoon split is refused, not shrunk toward league', () => {
|
|
const thin = { vl: side(0.350, 25), vr: side(0.250, 400) };
|
|
const out = hf.adjustProbability(0.6, { platoonSplits: thin, bats: 'R', throws: 'L' });
|
|
expect(out.applied.find((a) => a.factor === 'platoon_severity')).toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('no pitcher profile contributes nothing at all', () => {
|
|
expect(hf.pitcherContactMultiplier(null)).toBeNull();
|
|
const out = hf.adjustProbability(0.6, { pitcherHardHit: null });
|
|
expect(out.p_adjusted).toBe(0.6);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('with NOTHING readable the forecast is returned exactly', () => {
|
|
const out = hf.adjustProbability(0.6, {});
|
|
expect(out.p_adjusted).toBe(0.6);
|
|
expect(out.multiplier).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(out.factors_fired).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a null forecast stays null — no factor invents one', () => {
|
|
expect(hf.adjustProbability(null, { pitcherHardHit: 0.46 }).p_adjusted).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('composition', () => {
|
|
it('three factors compound, and the stack is bounded', () => {
|
|
const out = hf.adjustProbability(0.6, {
|
|
spray: pullGround, bats: 'R', positionOaa: pos({ '3B': -12, SS: -12, '1B': -12, '2B': -12, LF: -12, CF: -12, RF: -12 }),
|
|
pitcherHardHit: 0.46, platoonSplits: bigSplit, throws: 'L',
|
|
});
|
|
expect(out.factors_fired).toBe(3);
|
|
expect(out.multiplier).toBeLessThanOrEqual(1 + hf.COMBINED_MAX);
|
|
expect(out.multiplier).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1 - hf.COMBINED_MAX);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('partial readability applies only what is readable', () => {
|
|
const out = hf.adjustProbability(0.6, { pitcherHardHit: 0.46, bats: 'S', spray: pullGround, positionOaa: pos({ '3B': 5 }) });
|
|
expect(out.factors_fired).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(out.applied[0].factor).toBe('pitcher_contact_profile');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|