Files
vyndr/tests/unit/artifactGovernance.test.js
T
builtbykev 94f7c3c3ef The probability never leaked across stats; the attribution did
Post-fix cohort df4ec562 closed the primary question: eleven non-hits stats,
1,910 rows, ZERO certified and ZERO numeric served probabilities. The cross-stat
repair holds.

But every one of those 1,910 rows still recorded
`artifact_id: mlb-hits-isotonic@2026-09-03` beside state UNSUPPORTED. A `doubles`
row named the hits artifact. Nothing was calibrated by it, so no number leaked —
but a later query for "rows this artifact produced" would have returned 2,186
instead of 133, and that is the shape of footgun this programme keeps finding.

The contract check runs BEFORE any artifact is relevant: with no certified
contract for the sport/stat, no artifact applies, and naming one asserts a
relationship that does not exist. UNSUPPORTED now carries null artifact,
artifact_id, estimator_type, estimator_version, certification_version and
procedure_version.

Attribution is KEPT where the artifact is genuinely the thing that declined —
UNCERTIFIED (out of support) and VERSION_MISMATCH both still name it. A test
holds both directions so this does not over-correct into erasing real provenance.

One existing test called resolve() without naming a stat and relied on the
service substituting one. That substitution was the original defect, so the test
now names its stat, as production does.

Artifact unchanged. Live OFF. Suite 405/405, 5,662 passed. Teeth 35/35 + 10/10 + 23/23.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CQJeAG8vcDoL5zkiaJyVb8
2026-09-03 18:33:31 -04:00

322 lines
16 KiB
JavaScript

'use strict';
/**
* A VALIDATOR IS NOT A REPAIR. `servable:false` must mean something mechanically.
*
* The previous release detected the violation correctly and then served the
* certified state anyway. These tests exist so that cannot recur.
*/
const pc = require('../../src/services/model/probabilityContract');
const svc = require('../../src/services/model/probabilityContractService');
const registry = require('../../src/services/model/artifactRegistry');
const fp = require('../../src/services/model/fitPolicy');
const ERA = 'engine1@2026-08-07-fullwindow';
const good = registry.load('mlb', 'hits');
const read = (p) => ({ sport: 'mlb', stat: 'hits', model_version: ERA, p_win: p });
const est = () => 0.6;
describe('an unservable artifact can never emit a certified state', () => {
// Era and estimator mismatch resolve to VERSION_MISMATCH rather than the new
// state — that is DELIBERATE. "This artifact belongs to a different
// forecaster" is a more precise thing to say than "policy blocked", and the
// existing state already says it exactly. The invariant asserted for all six
// is the one that matters: never certified, never a number.
const violations = {
ERA_NOT_RESTRICTED: [{ era_audit: { era_counts: { [ERA]: 10, 'engine1@2026-07-20': 5 }, wrong_era_rows: 5 } }, 'ARTIFACT_POLICY_BLOCKED'],
MODEL_VERSION_MISMATCH: [{ model_version: 'engine1@2026-07-20' }, 'VERSION_MISMATCH'],
ESTIMATOR_MISMATCH: [{ estimator_type: 'low_param' }, 'VERSION_MISMATCH'],
MISSING_IDENTITY: [{ knot_digest: null }, 'ARTIFACT_POLICY_BLOCKED'],
THIN_FIT: [{ fit_n: 3 }, 'ARTIFACT_POLICY_BLOCKED'],
SUPPORT_WIDENING: [{ certified_bands: [[0.50, 0.99]] }, 'ARTIFACT_POLICY_BLOCKED'],
};
for (const [name, [over, expected]] of Object.entries(violations)) {
it(`${name} -> ${expected}, never CERTIFIED_CALIBRATED`, () => {
const base = { ...good, ...over };
const check = fp.validate(base, { era_counts: base.era_audit ? base.era_audit.era_counts : null });
expect(check.servable).toBe(false);
const artifact = { ...base, servable: check.servable, fit_policy_violations: check.violations };
const r = pc.resolve(read(0.65), { estimate: est, artifact });
expect(r.probability_state).toBe(pc.STATE[expected]);
expect(r.probability_state).not.toBe(pc.STATE.CERTIFIED_CALIBRATED);
expect(r.served_probability).toBeNull();
expect(r.raw_model_probability).toBe(0.65); // raw is still evidence
expect(pc.derivedClaims(r, -115).available).toBe(false);
});
}
it('and every probability-derived claim is withheld with it', () => {
const artifact = { ...good, servable: false, fit_policy_violations: ['ERA_NOT_RESTRICTED'] };
const d = pc.derivedClaims(pc.resolve(read(0.65), { estimate: est, artifact }), -115);
expect(d.available).toBe(false);
expect(d.ev_pct).toBeNull();
expect(d.kelly).toBeNull();
expect(d.value).toBeNull();
});
it('the blocked state names the violation rather than shrugging', () => {
const artifact = { ...good, servable: false, fit_policy_violations: ['ERA_NOT_RESTRICTED'] };
expect(pc.resolve(read(0.65), { estimate: est, artifact }).reason).toContain('ERA_NOT_RESTRICTED');
});
});
describe('no environment variable can override the gate', () => {
const artifact = { ...good, servable: false, fit_policy_violations: ['ERA_NOT_RESTRICTED'] };
it('shadow ON does not make an unservable artifact certify', () => {
expect(pc.shadowState({ PROBABILITY_CONTRACT_SHADOW: '1' }).shadow).toBe('ON');
// the gate lives in the resolution, not beside the flag
const r = pc.resolve(read(0.65), { estimate: est, artifact });
expect(r.probability_state).toBe(pc.STATE.ARTIFACT_POLICY_BLOCKED);
});
it('resolve takes no flag, so there is nothing for a flag to reach', () => {
const src = require('fs').readFileSync(
require('path').join(__dirname, '../../src/services/model/probabilityContract.js'), 'utf8');
const body = src.slice(src.indexOf('function resolve'), src.indexOf('const isCertified'));
expect(body).not.toContain('process.env');
expect(body).not.toContain('PROBABILITY_CONTRACT_SHADOW');
});
});
describe('one validity decision for shadow AND live', () => {
it('a shadow-approved artifact is refused for live use', () => {
expect(good.approved_for_shadow).toBe(true);
expect(good.approved_for_live).toBe(false);
const live = pc.resolve(read(0.65), { estimate: est, artifact: good, usage: 'live' });
expect(live.probability_state).toBe(pc.STATE.ARTIFACT_POLICY_BLOCKED);
expect(live.reason).toContain('not promoted for live');
const shadow = pc.resolve(read(0.65), { estimate: est, artifact: good, usage: 'shadow' });
expect(shadow.probability_state).toBe(pc.STATE.CERTIFIED_CALIBRATED);
});
it('live consumes the SAME servable decision, not a parallel one', () => {
const bad = { ...good, servable: false, approved_for_live: true, fit_policy_violations: ['X'] };
expect(pc.resolve(read(0.65), { estimate: est, artifact: bad, usage: 'live' }).probability_state)
.toBe(pc.STATE.ARTIFACT_POLICY_BLOCKED);
});
});
describe('the active curve does not move', () => {
it('the runtime holds no fitter — nothing to refit on a snapshot', () => {
const src = require('fs').readFileSync(
require('path').join(__dirname, '../../src/services/model/probabilityContractService.js'), 'utf8');
const code = src.replace(/\/\*[\s\S]*?\*\//g, '').replace(/^\s*\/\/.*$/gm, '');
expect(code).not.toContain('fitIsotonic');
expect(code).not.toContain('fromLedger');
expect(code).not.toContain('loadRows');
});
it('repeated builds return the same artifact object and the same numbers', async () => {
const a = await svc.build(null, { sport: 'mlb', stat: 'hits' });
const b = await svc.build(null, { sport: 'mlb', stat: 'hits' });
expect(a.artifact).toBe(b.artifact); // cached, identical identity
expect(a.artifact.source_digest).toBe(b.artifact.source_digest);
expect(a.resolve(read(0.72)).served_probability).toBe(b.resolve(read(0.72)).served_probability);
});
it('a new settled outcome cannot alter the curve — it is a committed file', () => {
const before = registry.applyCurve(good, 0.65);
registry.__resetCache();
const after = registry.applyCurve(registry.load('mlb', 'hits'), 0.65);
expect(after).toBe(before);
});
});
describe('promotion is a deliberate act', () => {
it('the promotion table is a frozen source constant, not runtime state', () => {
expect(Object.isFrozen(registry.PROMOTED)).toBe(true);
expect(Object.isFrozen(registry.PROMOTED['mlb:hits'])).toBe(true);
// strict mode makes the write throw rather than fail silently — either way
// the table is unchanged, which is the property under test
expect(() => { registry.PROMOTED['mlb:rbi'] = { artifact_id: 'x', stage: 'APPROVED_FOR_LIVE' }; }).toThrow();
expect(registry.PROMOTED['mlb:rbi']).toBeUndefined();
});
it('an artifact file that exists but is not named is NOT loaded', () => {
// load() resolves the file FROM the promotion table, so an unnamed artifact
// sitting in the directory is inert.
expect(registry.load('mlb', 'rbi')).toBeNull();
});
it('the loaded artifact id must equal the promoted id', () => {
expect(registry.load('mlb', 'hits').artifact_id).toBe(registry.PROMOTED['mlb:hits'].artifact_id);
});
it('a file declaring a DIFFERENT id is refused — dropping one in promotes nothing', () => {
const promoted = registry.PROMOTED['mlb:hits'];
expect(registry.acceptFile({ artifact_id: promoted.artifact_id }, promoted)).toBe(true);
// the case load() can never reach on the happy path, and the reason the
// guard existed unprotected until a teeth injection came back green
expect(registry.acceptFile({ artifact_id: 'mlb-hits-isotonic@2099-01-01' }, promoted)).toBe(false);
expect(registry.acceptFile({ artifact_id: null }, promoted)).toBe(false);
expect(registry.acceptFile({}, promoted)).toBe(false);
expect(registry.acceptFile(null, promoted)).toBe(false);
expect(registry.acceptFile({ artifact_id: 'x' }, null)).toBe(false);
});
});
describe('model-era transition law', () => {
it('a NEW model era does not inherit this artifact', () => {
const r = pc.resolve({ sport: 'mlb', stat: 'hits', model_version: 'engine1@2027-01-01', p_win: 0.65 },
{ estimate: est, artifact: good });
expect(r.probability_state).toBe(pc.STATE.VERSION_MISMATCH);
expect(r.served_probability).toBeNull();
});
it('and an artifact relabelled to a new era fails its own policy', () => {
const relabelled = { ...good, model_version: 'engine1@2027-01-01' };
const check = fp.validate(relabelled, { era_counts: good.era_audit.era_counts });
expect(check.valid).toBe(false);
expect(check.servable).toBe(false);
});
});
describe('the runtime can name its artifact with the shadow OFF', () => {
it('reports the full identity without enabling anything', () => {
const st = pc.shadowState({});
expect(st.shadow).toBe('OFF');
expect(st.live_serving).toBe('OFF');
const a = st.artifact;
for (const k of ['artifact_id', 'procedure_version', 'model_version', 'fit_as_of',
'training_cutoff', 'fit_n', 'source_digest', 'knot_digest', 'served_curve_digest',
'certified_bands', 'stage']) expect(a[k]).toBeTruthy();
expect(a.servable).toBe(true);
expect(a.approved_for_shadow).toBe(true);
expect(a.approved_for_live).toBe(false);
expect(a.wrong_era_rows).toBe(0);
expect(a.withheld_from_fit).toBe(0);
});
it('does not put a second copy of the curve on a status surface', () => {
expect(pc.shadowState({}).artifact.served_curve).toBeUndefined();
});
it('two resolutions return the same artifact — no refit between calls', () => {
expect(JSON.stringify(pc.shadowState({}).artifact))
.toBe(JSON.stringify(pc.shadowState({}).artifact));
});
});
describe('ONE ARTIFACT, ONE STAT — the cross-stat leak found by cohort 0353c551', () => {
const retention = require('../../src/services/retentionService');
/** The real collector, with a MIXED-STAT batch — the shape production sends. */
function mixedBatch() {
const c = retention.createCollector({
snapshotId: 's1', sport: 'mlb', modelVersion: ERA, codeSha: 't',
gameDate: '2026-09-03', gameIdFor: () => 'mlb:2026-09-03:AAA@BBB',
});
for (const stat of ['hits', 'total_bases', 'rbi', 'runs', 'walks', 'strikeouts', 'home_runs']) {
c.onGraded(
{ player: `P ${stat}`, stat_type: stat, line: 0.5, sport: 'mlb', over_odds: -110, under_odds: -110 },
[{ direction: 'over', grade: 'C+', p_win: 0.65, confidence: 65 }],
);
}
return c.rows;
}
it('calibrates hits and NOTHING else, even in one mixed batch', async () => {
const contract = await svc.build(null, { sport: 'mlb', stat: 'hits' });
const merged = retention.mergeProbabilityContract(mixedBatch(), contract);
const byStat = {};
for (const r of merged) {
byStat[r.stat] = byStat[r.stat] || { certified: 0, served: 0, other: 0 };
const st = r.probability_contract.probability_state;
if (st === pc.STATE.CERTIFIED_CALIBRATED) byStat[r.stat].certified++;
else byStat[r.stat].other++;
if (r.probability_contract.served_probability != null) byStat[r.stat].served++;
}
// hits: calibrated. p_win 0.65 sits inside certified support.
expect(byStat.hits.certified).toBeGreaterThan(0);
expect(byStat.hits.served).toBeGreaterThan(0);
// EVERY other stat: no certified state and no number, at the SAME p_win.
for (const stat of ['total_bases', 'rbi', 'runs', 'walks', 'strikeouts', 'home_runs']) {
expect(byStat[stat].certified).toBe(0);
expect(byStat[stat].served).toBe(0);
}
});
it('a non-hits row resolves UNSUPPORTED — the contract does not exist for it', async () => {
const contract = await svc.build(null, { sport: 'mlb', stat: 'hits' });
const [tb] = retention.mergeProbabilityContract(
mixedBatch().filter((r) => r.stat === 'total_bases'), contract);
expect(tb.probability_contract.probability_state).toBe(pc.STATE.UNSUPPORTED);
expect(tb.probability_contract.served_probability).toBeNull();
expect(tb.probability_contract.derived.available).toBe(false);
});
it('the resolver does not substitute its own identity for the row\'s', async () => {
const contract = await svc.build(null, { sport: 'mlb', stat: 'hits' });
// a read naming another stat must NOT be resolved as hits
expect(contract.resolve({ sport: 'mlb', stat: 'rbi', model_version: ERA, p_win: 0.65 })
.probability_state).toBe(pc.STATE.UNSUPPORTED);
// and a read naming NO stat resolves to no contract, never a fallback
expect(contract.resolve({ model_version: ERA, p_win: 0.65 })
.probability_state).toBe(pc.STATE.UNSUPPORTED);
});
it('an artifact for another stat is refused even with correct plumbing', () => {
const wrong = { ...good, stat: 'total_bases' };
const r = pc.resolve(read(0.65), { estimate: est, artifact: wrong });
expect(r.probability_state).toBe(pc.STATE.VERSION_MISMATCH);
expect(r.served_probability).toBeNull();
expect(r.reason).toContain('total_bases');
});
it('and an artifact for another sport is refused', () => {
const r = pc.resolve(read(0.65), { estimate: est, artifact: { ...good, sport: 'wnba' } });
expect(r.probability_state).toBe(pc.STATE.VERSION_MISMATCH);
expect(r.served_probability).toBeNull();
});
});
describe('an UNSUPPORTED row attributes no artifact', () => {
const retention = require('../../src/services/retentionService');
it('names no artifact for a stat that has no contract', () => {
const r = pc.resolve({ sport: 'mlb', stat: 'doubles', model_version: ERA, p_win: 0.65 },
{ estimate: est, artifact: good });
expect(r.probability_state).toBe(pc.STATE.UNSUPPORTED);
expect(r.served_probability).toBeNull();
// the attribution, not just the number
expect(r.artifact).toBeNull();
expect(r.artifact_id).toBeNull();
expect(r.estimator_type).toBeNull();
expect(r.procedure_version).toBeNull();
expect(JSON.stringify(r)).not.toContain(good.artifact_id);
});
it('but a hits row in the same batch still carries the full identity', async () => {
const contract = await svc.build(null, { sport: 'mlb', stat: 'hits' });
const c = retention.createCollector({
snapshotId: 's2', sport: 'mlb', modelVersion: ERA, codeSha: 't',
gameDate: '2026-09-03', gameIdFor: () => 'g',
});
for (const stat of ['hits', 'doubles']) {
c.onGraded({ player: `P ${stat}`, stat_type: stat, line: 0.5, sport: 'mlb', over_odds: -110, under_odds: -110 },
[{ direction: 'over', grade: 'C+', p_win: 0.65, confidence: 65 }]);
}
const merged = retention.mergeProbabilityContract(c.rows, contract);
const hits = merged.find((r) => r.stat === 'hits').probability_contract;
const doubles = merged.find((r) => r.stat === 'doubles').probability_contract;
expect(hits.artifact.artifact_id).toBe(good.artifact_id);
expect(hits.served_probability).not.toBeNull();
expect(doubles.artifact).toBeNull();
expect(doubles.served_probability).toBeNull();
expect(doubles.probability_state).toBe(pc.STATE.UNSUPPORTED);
});
it('an artifact IS still named where it is the relevant one', () => {
// uncertified (out of support) and version-mismatch rows keep attribution:
// there the artifact was consulted and is the thing that declined.
expect(pc.resolve(read(0.91), { estimate: est, artifact: good }).artifact).not.toBeNull();
expect(pc.resolve(read(0.65, { model_version: 'other' }), { estimate: est, artifact: good }).artifact)
.not.toBeNull();
});
});